
My Life as a Bagger
May 18, 2008Last December, as part of the Junior Engagement Program (JEEP) of the OSCI, I was required to go on a three day immersion at Robinsons Supermarket in Marikina. What seemed to be fun at first eventually led to much boredom and a significant improvement in understanding the lives of people behind the cash registers and customer service counters. At the time, I was enrolled in an Operations Management class where terms such as employee empowerment, job specialization and “idle times” became familiar to me. Theoretically it was easy to understand, however, putting faces behind these words made it a matter of a little more significance to me.
Similarly, in Economics we learn the idea behind the Law of Diminishing Returns – where if a firm keeps increasing only one input such as labor, while holding the level of other inputs like supplies and grocery stocks constant, they experience inefficiency. During my first 8-hour shift behind the customer service counter, I witnessed the gravity of the situation. Considering I was one of several students in the JEEP program, so much extra workers were on hand while the level of work was constant. To my “ate”, the personnel assigned to me, I seemed like more of a distraction and the more I helped, the more idle time we had. By the end of the day, I was practically ready to write her life’s biography. As a grocery store employee, you can only do so much. Merchandisers roam about all day, while cashiers beep away and baggers simply bag. It’s not like the work is all that difficult really, it’s just that they can only do as they are tasked. In this situation, there is no room for growth and employee empowerment. Although Adam Smith says job specialization can be good for work is more concentrated, this too has its downside. Standing for 8 hours is no joke. Neither is it when you have to call a supervisor to correct a petty mistake that you can well do on your own.
Workers such as those employed in Supermarkets are employed contractually – meaning no job security and no benefits. As the law of Diminishing Returns indicates, oftentimes not enough work + too many employees = inefficiency. There always comes a point wherein if all else remains the same, increasing workers will no longer be beneficial to the firm. At times where shoppers are less, less workers are hired. The workers I met during my three-day stint in the grocery, were very dedicated to their jobs and took every 15 minute break very seriously. In spite of this, in another month or so, they once again go in search of new jobs no more challenging than the ones they had. What happens to the person stuck in this never ending cycle? I wonder what this says about the state of the Filipino?
- Karissa Herrera
Photos from http://www.robinsons-supermarket.com.ph/EWSL/ewsl.htm


nice work krissa belated happy birthday =P
yes during the ancient times these things happened too not much to go around for everyone else capitalism at its finest hour
The nature of bagger jobs as contractual (meaning a 6 month contract or less) already says alot.
In these types of openings, grocery owners invest little to nothing in HR because the nature of the job is repetitive and requires only 2 credentials; a bio-data and an NBI clearance.
The law of diminishing returns can be analyzed in these facets of organizational behavior; 1) job performance, 2) job skills and 3) motivation. The consequence of this classic case of ‘overspecialization’ because of lack of job rotation, has limited employees’ job skills, diminishes job performance and has caused low motivation.
What’s sad is that these people are forced to place ‘making a living’ on top of continuous development due to their socio-economic backgrounds.
Grocery owners are also not required to deduct SSS, pag-ibig and phil-health from these contractual employees’ basic compensation, unlike their regular counterparts. (not doing so is against the law).
A contractual job is also beneficial for the employee. Because it is a short-term contract, he/she can focus on finding a more financially and a more challenging but rewarding job, after the contract is expired.
The thought that this scenario is common in the country is depressing. In addition, most people believe that an increase in the number of laborers is beneficial; however, this is not always the case.
This shows a part of the reality of the labor situation in our country. I believe that there are cases which are far more worse. I think the government should try to improve the the legal system behind this so that the workers will at least have better compensation for their efforts.
oo nga, i agree
hi karissa!
I also thought about things like this when we were in our jeep experience. It shows that so much can be done to improve systems and processes.
On the other hand, bagging was really tiring for me and I think there was not that much idle time as a bagger. I would like to say more to comment but I have to go! see you!
Makes me remember my Bagging days in SM MegaMall. (for my Xavier High School Immersion) [I could also see some of my class mates roaming/idling around at times because they were not really needed.] As they say, too many cooks spoil the broth. :p And it’s sad that these workers don’t really get job security and benefits. They’re just being used by the companies. (but the companies could care less for their employees) I guess the lack of jobs force these people to accept even the harshest working conditions. Hopefully more jobs would be opened to lessen the amount of jobless people and to promote a more efficient workforce for the betterment of the country.
It’s sad how our society has become so entrenched in the mechanics of labor that even human beings are thought of as mere inputs to the system. Those “marginal units of labor” are hardworking citizens sacrificing their time, effort, health and sometimes even education just to make ends meet. Why must we objectify people in everything that we do? Does it make the system more efficient when the human element of work / labor is taken out of the equation? It’s so wrong. But I guess it makes things easier for The Man. After all, how can you look a person in the eye and tell him, “I’m sorry, but your marginal utility to my business has diminished beyond redemption. I don’t need you anymore. Please pack your things and leave before you add another cent to my marginal costs. Kthxbye!” Thinking and talking in objective terms falls in line with the capitalist mode of thinking: walang personalan, trabaho lang po.
For the record, I don’t think you caused Robinsons’ marginal returns to diminish! Malay mo, the other grocery workers became more productive pa because you were there to keep them entertained. haha!
It’s sad how our society has become so entrenched in the mechanics of labor that even human beings are thought of as mere inputs to the system. Those “marginal units of labor” are hardworking citizens sacrificing their time, effort, health and sometimes even education just to make ends meet. Why must we objectify people in everything that we do? Does it make the system more efficient when the human element of work / labor is taken out of the equation? It’s so wrong.